This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: simplify assertion check in _dl_fini()

From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 06 Dec 2004 19:13:59 -0200
Subject: Re: simplify assertion check in _dl_fini()
Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
References: <oroehgtp86.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><41B3E7F5.4080007@redhat.com>

On Dec  6, 2004, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> Why should runtime overhead be added just to simplify asserts which are
> not present in final binaries?

To keep the data structure consistent before the inconsistency
actually bites?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

References:
- Re: simplify assertion check in _dl_fini()
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]