This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Fwd: Re: Enforcing gcc-4.1 for Powerpc -mlong-double-128]

From: Steven Munroe <munroesj at us dot ibm dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:20:59 -0600
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Enforcing gcc-4.1 for Powerpc -mlong-double-128]

I have verifed that gcc-4.0 builds powerpc64 with -mlong-double-128. So
if we need to enforce a minimum gcc level for long double we can use
gcc-4.0.

--- Begin Message ---

From: Steven Munroe <munroesj at us dot ibm dot com>

To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>

Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>

Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:45:51 -0600

Subject: Re: Enforcing gcc-4.1 for Powerpc -mlong-double-128

Organization: IBM LTC

References: <20060201031927.D2511180B7B@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Roland McGrath wrote:
>>gcc-3.4 now ICEs <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26049> for
>>building powerpc64 -mlong-double-128 with current glibc cvs. This had
>>worked in the past.
>>    
>
>What about 4.0?
>
>  
gcc-4.0 seems to be ok. At least does not ICE for the test case that
take out gcc-3.4.
Have not tried a full glibc -mlong-double-128 build lately thoe...
--- End Message ---

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]