This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Missing Sparc Implies

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Missing Sparc Implies

> From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:47:08 -0800 (PST)
> 
> > I don't think ought to be necessary.  If it is, I'd like to fix the
> > configure magic so it's not.  Those Implies files from the main source
> > should cause those add-on directories to be searched too.
> 
> This doesn't happen in the top-level either, that's why we need
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies and friends
> eventhough we have sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies.

I'm not following you.  The main tree tree has
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/sparcv9b/Implies already.
Another one should not be required in the add-on too.
The one would not be required either if we used sparcv9/sparcv9b instead.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Missing Sparc Implies
  - From: David S. Miller

References:
- Re: [PATCH]: Missing Sparc Implies
  - From: David S. Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]