This is the mail archive of the
libc-help@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: inlining failed
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Nix <nix at esperi dot org dot uk>
- Cc: "Dominik Táborský" <bremby at seznam dot cz>, libc-help at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:04:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: inlining failed
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=7rROPF9SJALuD+nNIVyzKmREahliULncnF2Wy+xff68=; b=UhjfIBlOFdV7xFUaMdzRiu48uktqcXOhg03BmZBGb+dyu1ioICBheRutYG1ye4nqsV 4mW/UIeefeXa7MZs0Uq1JRjol7dyD1mTwirQOstqjiNyCXAu5cKnFnS7VGNY7QepnQ/8 dna2jUiX9TZnEd+TXvplqV7TtQ/TgtbVIEx3E=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=chlHNYsbHYF3Pyt6jlTMDbV3CKefFAu+sWryxqf6+8M3ZYjdEa//umhsiNKK9K+IYt P4O7+w4K/YQot/em1MZSpRDMPodA0FQn0TbO9c38m0DTNuWxrJ1SD8ZWTWmJGkYaWDhV rFqcmcN+WFdjsB+DYoP2wWLDRg4cEr3PdueW0=
- References: <1227974019.24048.32.camel@eddy> <87wsemclqi.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2008, Dominik Táborsk told this:
>> I think the -fno-stack-protector is also needed to compile glibc, but so
>> far, no matter how hard I've tried, how long I have been googling this,
>> I just can't get it compiled...
>
> I posted a patch a while back that allows glibc to build and pass all
> but one of its tests with stack protection turned on in CFLAGS, which
> might help. Let's see, ah, here:
>
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2008-07/msg00062.html>
>
> (2.8, sorry: I'm about to update it to 2.9.)
This looks like a nice patch, have you submitted it as an enhancement
in the bugzilla?
Could you also submit this to eglibc? Embedded targets could make good
use of this.
(patches@eglibc.org http://www.eglibc.org/mailing_lists)
> Nobody commented, not even with regard to the apprarent stack corruption
> in strtol() spotted by running the testsuite with the stack protector on.
If you think there is a bug in strtol() please open a bugzilla issue
along with your analysis. After all we are a volunteer project.
Cheers,
Carlos.