This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: [PATCH] small changes for fa_IR
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>
- To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: Hamed Malek <hamed at bamdad dot org>, Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at sharif dot edu>, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at cs dot toronto dot edu>, libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 21 Mar 2004 11:45:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] small changes for fa_IR
- References: <1079442878.2019.9.camel@hooloo.bamdad.org>
- Reply-by: Tue, 1 Jan 1801 04:37:40 +1000
[Hamed Malek]
> -category "fa_IR:2002";LC_IDENTIFICATION
> +category "fa_IR:2004";LC_IDENTIFICATION
Isn't the category field supposed to include a reference to the
standard used, and not the locale name and the year of the last
change? I'm aware that almost all locales are incorrect in this
regard, but plan to change it. I suspect this is the more correct
content:
category "i18n:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION
or
category "posix:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION
I have a patch for ld-identification.c to check the content, but
haven't submitted it yet as I do not really know the allowed list of
standard references. Am I mistaken?