This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- From: "yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 13 Dec 2005 23:09:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From yury_tarasievich at yahoo dot com 2005-12-13 23:09 -------
Let me re-iterate (and bring this back to topic):
I am, generally, *in* *favour* of this separation of locales.
The way I see it, if folks want their very own sub-locale, then okay and good riddance.
There's already latin-scripted sub-locale approved, created, I hear, for the userbase that is yet to
emerge one day. So why not one extra?
But then, the initially proposed "classic" qualifier is inappropriate and unmerited, either measured by
popular support or by usage tradition.
And google hits aren't relevant at all to this exact question of being or not being classic.
Other things, and quite material at that, are.
Be it noticed, I do *not* accept even the general quality of Mr.Shupa's expoundations.
But that kind of discussion would be well out of scope of this issue.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.