This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/2125] localedata has problems for ro_RO
- From: "eddy dot petrisor at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 2 May 2006 06:38:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/2125] localedata has problems for ro_RO
- References: <20060109102645.2125.eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From eddy dot petrisor at gmail dot com 2006-05-02 06:38 -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> I added the locale changes. But it seems you never relaly tested it.
I have been running those changes for almost two months now, so I wouldn't say I
never really tested them.
> The
> lang_term and lang_lib fields were missing.
I am really sorry; it appears that I converted an older version of the files
used to create a patch when I was trying not to use patches (as you requested).
I will check again to see if nothing else was lost.
Could you be more clear, have you added lang_term and lang_lib?
FWIW, the file split attachements were consistent wit each other (the fields in
question were not mentioned in the changelog); Thanks for noticing!
> The ISO 4217 data has already been updated.
I don't know who did this, but in Debian this change was made some time before
the actual new locale enetered. Maybe Denis Barbier pushed it here.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2125
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.