This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: QUESTION: LC_COLLATE minimal requirements?
- From: "Pravin S" <pravin dot d dot s at gmail dot com>
- To: Harshula <harshula at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper at redhat dot com>, libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:20:29 +0530
- Subject: Re: QUESTION: LC_COLLATE minimal requirements?
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tbGaY+ghjEPO59luMNFNdfPDYJDTYLQuTlO0Ub/G3t8=; b=Sdp5/HE7d5eUsVS3fhIXfeszoZJxig16qyVOKCILq+sT5Fh2wi1r+dCtkT25zdFSkM 1wnnh6JczAk3WgOR+wOl13A/stbcUqQExnbNm7d8+nQ03xtSVr8dFpQtakvGKcMVjQwK ddpjy5baPJVH5RWDobaPJ0KTnpvC9R9HnVWHE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CTIP8EbR2DG/9cQIePJe75umOC5Cx5KxlCY4/evgVrLmlVZn3MIobB4nDHEDAFH8aG i2LC/OfOgGzlrWDUom9swM2fDFVH6brJXuVQKFO1n977WzP3qYFV/YkXGolUlf5V2uHa zMYE0KDGsvhbDBKy/qXu5bZWAi5vvDKYKdz3k=
- References: <1223826729.4898.72.camel@B1.HOME> <764372c80810132241n21ec36e4uf8f13d1b5cc60d77@mail.gmail.com> <48F4DF40.2020101@redhat.com> <1224429227.18677.18.camel@B1.HOME>
Hi All,
2008/10/19 Harshula <harshula@gmail.com>:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:04 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
>> >> Q1) Is it a requirement to use the collating-symbol keyword to define
>> >> ALL symbols? If not, is this patch sufficient and acceptable for glibc?
>> >> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/iso14651_t1_common-glibc.patch?root=sinhala&view=log
>>
>> It's better to follow the example of the other languages. This results
>> in better tables. And it's trivial. Just use
>>
>> <U0DF4> <U0DF4>;<BAS>;<MIN>;IGNORE
>>
>> etc
>
> Thanks, I've made the changes.
>
> Patch:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/iso14651_t1_common-glibc.patch?root=sinhala&view=log
>
> Testcase:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/mysql-data-sinhala.txt?root=sinhala&view=log
>
> Correct output from 'sort':
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/glibc-collation-correct.txt?root=sinhala&view=log
>
>
Harshula I think,
It will be nice if you filed bug @
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=glibc
and submit patch there, it will be good for tracking
Thanks & Regards,
----------------------
Pravin Satpute