This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: patches to libc-ports
- From: "Bridge Wu" <mingqiao dot wu at gmail dot com>
- To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:28:13 +0800
- Subject: Re: patches to libc-ports
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ayh1+SBsUCWJi1/eG9Jl5hZZHHCg0Hoo4h0+4g+MUyAQHfcBMqPBeA8UjeTvqoq6X1sKc0Y4HgbuUjLkbXjlpdC2+aX0f9uPhaoNRsMoj1Wbq3/TWWYN44xrLMjhUmeAXY4A3q0b/0L7fCbnpLZqd0r9To8TtNqzYZZMRCmH1xI=
- References: <246188420606202358s6d75e3d3x42d52dbf85b53c18@mail.gmail.com> <200606210344.38597.vapier@gentoo.org>
I'm looking for patches of libc-ports for ARM. I got to know "Fix up
ARM EABI for removed syscalls" patch was here. But I'm not sure which
patches except this are needed as well.
I checked out the latest one from cvs and found it does include above
patch. This should be the latest version and include all the patches
mentioned here, right? Thank you very much.
On 6/21/06, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 02:58, Bridge Wu wrote:
> Can I regard here is the only site to get the patches to libc-ports?
huh ? what are you looking for ?
> Is it enough to apply the corresponding patches here to get the latest
> libc-ports?
fetch it from cvs
cvs -z 9 -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/glibc co ports
or grab the ports tarball
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/glibc/releases
-mike
--
best regards,
-Bridge