This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: Re: (ARM EABI) ports-20061127 + kernel-headers-2.6.18 %3D%3D broken system
- From: Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk>
- To: drow at false dot org
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:23:27 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: Re: (ARM EABI) ports-20061127 + kernel-headers-2.6.18 %3D%3D broken system
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=u6vlWqczLLx3IjLtRavxoKAvOGlzIZSMGizQ2sg1IdQnozRo/vQn5fJXrZGHy8MksQws+T9CCr2qn+WPrGUgM8Gx0yj3qYPxguO19roROW0J8mVqA9X8LGcsizs6+D39ul0fb/8eM6gnWhMBAC8M2tmrYJKuJId8XRhClyFie1g=;
Ive dissassembled both libcs. The most obvious difference is the function is
empty in the broken version. Furthermore it seems I compiled the new libc with
-fomit-frame-pointer, while the previous was was with frame-pointer. Could this
be what triggered the breakage?
--- libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:35:52AM +0000, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > OK. Attached is the output of strace -f rm <file> of both the previous
> > glibc+ports20060925 compiled with 2.6.17 headers (I think) and
> > glibc+ports20061127 compiled with 2.6.18 sanitised headers. The prior
works,
> > the latter doesn't.
>
> I have no idea how you've provoked this behavior but you didn't even
> get it to call lstat; I think you'll need to debug into that call to
> find out what's gone wrong.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
Steve
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com