This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: (ARM EABI) ports-20061127 + kernel-headers-2.6.18 == broken system
- From: Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 21:35:11 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: (ARM EABI) ports-20061127 + kernel-headers-2.6.18 == broken system
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=SAwLXIFkz5b66Jsot/Zo4Le8ATB/UKvcYzbQ25vyvOZqbZ98pTt1wBw7/vLRCjnpbOeO7vyFsxs7/kTonA27imbXD5YwNL32YdD6+rdSbix0fvzUg1eRdKPEMEOIw6nqWjM38HNh5qQgSMjXoMjQm0tdoIJIh2jSWlClYsoklTc=;
--- Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> On 12/3/06, Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > What is the correct fix?
>
> For your target arch figure out which kernel version is required to
> enable __ASSUME_ATFCTS, and then build with atleast that version in
> --enable-kernel.
> This is all just speculation, you'll have to verify this yourself.
I've been looking in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux and
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm. The __ASSUME_ATFCTS define is only in the
core glibc kernel-features.h not in the ARM ports addon version. Should I just
update ports/.../arm/kernel-features.h? There's no reason to assume these
syscalls haven't been implemented for ARM is there?
I can't get into my kernel sources at the momemnt, my development server is
down... :-(
Steve
___________________________________________________________
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html