This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API
- From: David Daney <ddaney at caviumnetworks dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf at linux-mips dot org>
- Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>, linux-mips at linux-mips dot org, libc-ports at sourceware dot org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at linux-mips dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:37:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] MIPS: Implement the getcontext API
- References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902282326580.4064@tp.orcam.me.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904152018070.3560@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
Hello,
Here is code to implement the getcontext API for MIPS. This glibc patch
is sent to the linux-mips mailing list, because it makes use of an
internal syscall which has not been designated as a part of the public
ABI. I am writing to request this syscall to become fixed as a part of
the ABI or to seek for an alternative. See below for the rationale.
Was there any conclusion about whether the assumptions this patch makes
about the kernel are OK (and so it can go in) or not?
My (unofficial) conclusion is that this should be part of the kernel's
public ABI, and that you should commit the glibc patch. However, Ralf
should probably weigh in the subject so we can know this definitively.
David Daney