This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: onwards to git
- From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, Jim Meyering <jim at meyering dot net>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: onwards to git
- References: <49F89C2D.5060702@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904292008041.31467@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20090429203933.08694FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com> <87hc07dt5x.fsf@meyering.net> <20090430195521.B8C59FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com> <119aab440905010655o78fd98f2oc819a266f97e5c0d@mail.gmail.com> <m21vr8n4q6.fsf@igel.home> <119aab440905011129ke6bcab1re891f44f31daf992@mail.gmail.com>
> There is no glibc-2_9-branch in the git repo, are we missing branches?
You are talking about the glibc.git repository here. That one remains to
get its final conversion next week, and nobody should fork from it yet.
Its details get discussed on libc-alpha/libc-hacker, not libc-ports.
In this thread, we're talking about glibc-ports.git, which is "active" today.
Thanks,
Roland