This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello! On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:55:26AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 30 April 2009 11:00:42 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I think it's just going to make more work for the maintainers of each > > individual port. Mostly, they just keep working. It'll also be a > > pain for multi-platform distributors like Debian, who will have to do > > the merge anyway. > > it's also a pain for people who like to have 1 source tree and switch between > targets on the fly with only different configure targets. or for people who > want to quickly search all ports for how they handle some feature. > > i really dont see any upside to this. the proposed rebasing aspect is a > complete wash: public git repos should never have their pushed history > rebased, and local rebasing of the entire ports tree vs a single arch is > exactly the same considering the repo is so small. Mike, cool down. I was merely making a proposal. If you don't like it then that's fine. And nowhere did I say anything about rebasing commits. Also, if there is general consensus that this suggestion of mine is not needed or wanted -- no problem with that. :-) Regards, Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |