This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 02 May 2009 08:58:58 Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello! > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:55:26AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 30 April 2009 11:00:42 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > I think it's just going to make more work for the maintainers of each > > > individual port. Mostly, they just keep working. It'll also be a > > > pain for multi-platform distributors like Debian, who will have to do > > > the merge anyway. > > > > it's also a pain for people who like to have 1 source tree and switch > > between targets on the fly with only different configure targets. or for > > people who want to quickly search all ports for how they handle some > > feature. > > > > i really dont see any upside to this. the proposed rebasing aspect is a > > complete wash: public git repos should never have their pushed history > > rebased, and local rebasing of the entire ports tree vs a single arch is > > exactly the same considering the repo is so small. > > Mike, cool down. i dont know what you're talking about > I was merely making a proposal. and i was pointing out reasons why it was a bad idea. if you think people disagreeing with you means they're angry or something, then you'll have to rethink how proposals work on mailing lists. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |