This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: glibc-ports.git status
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:05:12 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: glibc-ports.git status
- References: <20090522033213.GJ14609@machine.or.cz> <20090524114440.GL14609@machine.or.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905282131310.24872@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <200905281757.00540.vapier@gentoo.org>
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 28 May 2009 17:42:26 Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > As a ports maintainer I am happy to create a 2.10 branch for ports
>
> could we get a glibc-2.10.1 tag to start with ?
I'm not sure what the correct procedures are for creating/naming tags or
who should create/sign it or whether there should be such tags for
previous ports releases as well, but I think
9c052b7cc1a903d5de8152d4cc9096c8f8f5f0e1 would be an appropriate point to
tag 2.10.1 and to use as the branchpoint, while
9f8832d47f51d4abbbb1e9034f638653c730ec5b is the only subsequent commit
suitable for backporting to such a 2.10 branch as is. (Parts of
d9056ac6554d3d9635344d77375ae60f13707001 would be suitable for 2.10 branch
as bugfixes, but care would be needed not to introduce a fallocate64
export in the process.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com