This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PULL REQUEST] Patches for alpha port

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net>, Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:31:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] Patches for alpha port
References: <20090713221738.GH10110@hall.aurel32.net> <20090716210317.C710B4702D@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Our convention as I understand it now is that each arch in ports has one
> or more individuals designated as responsible.  All such people are
> responsible both for the cardinal copyright rituals, and for general
> quality and appropriateness-for-GNU standards of the code in their
> bailiwick.  These folks either can push to sourceware git themselves, or
> their say-so is enough for a generally-empowered ports maintainer to
> commit/pull changes to their port(s).  (I'm not sure who is on that
> latter list now, maybe just Daniel?)

Let's stick with the list on the wiki - that makes it me, Alexandre,
and Joseph.

I'm not sure I do any good on that list nowadays, but there I am.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [PULL REQUEST] Patches for alpha port
  - From: Aurelien Jarno
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] Patches for alpha port
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]