This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ARM,MIPS,M68K] bits/fcntl.h update for F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETOWN_EX

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [ARM,MIPS,M68K] bits/fcntl.h update for F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETOWN_EX
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910031741310.10893@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m2k4zc1h15.fsf@igel.home>

On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> > I don't quite understand how these new values being the same as F_GETLK64 
> > and F_SETLK64 works, but having them the same as those values is exactly 
> > what the libc changes and kernel.org git appear to do.
> 
> I'm pretty sure this is a mistake, would you care to report it to the
> kernel people?

I have sent a message to linux-api and the patch author.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- [ARM,MIPS,M68K] bits/fcntl.h update for F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETOWN_EX
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [ARM,MIPS,M68K] bits/fcntl.h update for F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETOWN_EX
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]