This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 405/440/464/476 support and optimizations
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: "acrux at cruxppc dot org" <acrux at linuxmail dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:34:50 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 405/440/464/476 support and optimizations
- References: <1283448864.3854.56.camel@gargoyle> <AANLkTi=og_UD=p_GAjPAXn_MeyPUE2v6vjpq1uaQNNj7@mail.gmail.com> <1283526020.3854.77.camel@gargoyle> <1286218436.3679.1.camel@gargoyle> <1292271927.3622.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <AANLkTi=exjK4EvGG9FoU+iK8W3XjYzWew8q3o_t20URu@mail.gmail.com> <33163939.post@talk.nabble.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, acrux@cruxppc.org <acrux@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>
> just tried to build glibc-2.13 "--with-cpu=440 --with-fp" on a Sam440ep[1]
> (PPC440EP SoC [2]) but it remains stuck in this point:
> CPP='gcc -m32 -E -x c-header' ?/home/999/new/work/src/build32/elf/ld.so.1
> --library-path
> /home/999/new/work/src/build32:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/math:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/elf:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/dlfcn:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nss:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nis:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/rt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/resolv:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/crypt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nptl
> /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c
> rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o
> /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T
This is the first use of the newly build dynamic loader.
A failure here means that the dynamic loader has not been correctly compiled.
You should debug this to figure out what is going wrong in the loader.
> Here my config.log: http://cruxppc.org/~acrux/config.log
> Instead i successfully built glibc-2.13 without "--with-cpu=440 --with-fp" .
> I'm using an updated CRUX PPC 2.7 (32bit): gcc-4.5.3, binutils-2.21.1,
> glibc-2.12.2
Have you tested your compiler? What were the test results?
Did you test binutils? What were the test results?
Cheers,
Carlos.