This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: Website redirects.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>, libc-ports at sourceware dot org, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:13:48 -0500
- Subject: Re: Website redirects.
- References: <4F314062.6090006@mentor.com> <20120207174114.C74372C0B4@topped-with-meat.com>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> If you notice anything wrong with the website please
>> file a bugzilla ticket for the glibc component with
>> version "website" and assign them to me.
>>
>> Note: I would like to avoid adding a new component to
>> track website issues or requests.
>
> glibc is the product, not the component.
> We already have the "admin" component for this.
Thanks, I notice that the "admin" description includes "webpage."
> I don't think overloading the version field makes any sense at all.
> Please remove the bogus new version. ?Either an existing component
> makes sufficient sense, as "admin" certainly does for web site
> issues, or there should be a new component. ?It's no harder to add
> a new component than to add a new version, so I can't really imagine
> why you did this.
I did this because I wasn't smart enough to realize how bugzilla was setup :-)
Shall we add a website component and default assign it to me,
rewording the `admin' component to say "Administrativa: issues
relating to bugzilla itself, and repository access, etc. (things you
can deal with)?
Cheers,
Carlos.