This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path)


On 12 April 2012 12:38, Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> wrote:
> +++ Michael Hope [2012-04-12 12:16 +1200]:
>> 2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com>:
>
>> >> All good. ?My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
>> > ?Sorry for more bikeshedding,
>> > /lib/ld-linux-armv7hl.so.3
>> ?I'd rather drop the 'l'
>
> We've already had the GNU triplet-name argument for this ABI. I don't
> think having it again in order to use something slightly different for
> the linker name is very helpful.
>
> Unless of course we find that was another chimera and in fact that's
> not really agreed either...

Sorry, I should have said that in my reply.  I agree, the GNU triplet
should be used.  I couldn't resist going into the past-covered reasons
why.

-- Michael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]