This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libffi 3.0.9 release candidate 1


On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:29:08PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:23:29PM -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
> > Anthony Green wrote:
> > >Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > >>On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:06:53PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse
> > >>Adriaanse wrote:
> > >>>On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:57:30AM -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
> > >>>>Here's 3.0.9rc1:
> > >>>>ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/libffi/libffi-3.0.9rc1.tar.gz
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I built this out of my new git repository here:
> > >>>>http://github.com/atgreen/libffi
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I'm using stgit, which is like quilt for git.  I rebased the git
> > >>>>repository to gcc HEAD, then added the "stand-alone" patches (mostly
> > >>>>configury changes), the AVR port, the Snow Leopard memory protection
> > >>>>fix, and the 64-bit AIX fix.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I believe we're missing ChangeLog entries from Jens, Abdulaziz, and
> > >>>>Bradley.  Please send them.  I'll push your changes into GCC once
> > >>>>they're clean.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Abdulaziz - please also check that I applied your patch correctly.
> > >>>>The source files had changed somewhat since you submitted it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I'll set up a wiki page to track platform testing soon, but initial
> > >>>>test results and pointers to missing patches would be helpful.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>AG
> > >>>As of this RC, there's an increase of about 340 in failed tests on
> > >>>OpenBSD. I've attached the log. The unwindtest.cc failure is expected,
> > >>>ther others not. Anyone has a clue what's going on here?
> > >
> > >All the closure tests are failing.  Do you have time to help debug this?
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > I should mention that they work fine on x86_64 linux, so this either
> > has to do with x86_64 openbsd bits in the source or perhaps your
> > compiler version.  Which version of GCC are you using?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > AG
> I'm using "gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (propolice)" (default on OpenBSD. I can try
> again with gcc 4.2.4 after i built it.
> 
> Note, the closure regress tests also fail on OpenBSD/i386 (gcc 3)
> -- 
> "Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the
>   texture of the situation at hand"
>         -- Francisco Varela
compiling on of the regress tests manually with (egcc is gcc 4.2.4):

/usr/local/bin/egcc libffi.call/closure_fn0.c  -O0 -W -Wall -I../include/ -L ../.libs/ -lffi -lm -o a.out 

gives me:

libffi.call/ffitest.h:8:23: error: fficonfig.h: No such file or directory

which makes sense, as the topdir isn't in the include path of the
compile command, and fficonfig.h isn't in the -I../include/ but in -I../
(topdir).

then compiling with the added -I../ works, although it segfaults at run
time, and i cannot get a proper backtrace.


-- 
"Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the
  texture of the situation at hand"
        -- Francisco Varela


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]