_C_Swamp namespace

[Nathan Myers]

On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 05:39:09PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> 
> I have to say, swamp seems pretty good to me.  _C_ is just too short to
> be safe.  _C_internal_guts_ appeals to me, too.

I'm suggesting to "_C_legacy" in place of "_C_Swamp".
Recall that the main purpose of the namespace is to contain 
non-standardisms and other crud that have seeped into various
C headers on some target platforms.  

Comments?

Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org