Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:

| > I'm trying to check-in Joe's patch about std::equal with a test case
| > and I'm surprised to find the following inside std::equal:
| > 
| >   glibcpp_function_requires(EqualityComparableConcept<
| >         typename iterator_traits<_InputIter2>::value_type>);
| > 
| > which is wrong.
| 
| Well, it's the same thing that was there before, so if it's wrong now,
| it's always been wrong.

So it has always been wrong.

[...]

| I'll make this change later today, unless anybody can spot others.

Thanks.  Please make sure the library doesn't use identifiers in
user-namespace, that is using glibcpp_function_requires for example is
not right.  Thats is why the library has always been "uglified".

-- Gaby