[PING**2] [PATCH, libstdc++] Add missing free-standing headers to install rule

[Bernd Edlinger]

On 22.03.2016 20:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22/03/16 18:29 +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Yes. Maybe changing concept_check.h would be better, because
>> I see 3 different instances of bits/c++config.h:
>>
>> $prefix/arm-eabi/include/c++/6.0.0/arm-eabi/fpu/bits/c++config.h
>> $prefix/arm-eabi/include/c++/6.0.0/arm-eabi/bits/c++config.h
>> $prefix/arm-eabi/include/c++/6.0.0/arm-eabi/thumb/bits/c++config.h
>
> But they're all generated from the same include/bits/c++config in the
> source tree, so that shouldn't matter.
>
>> while I only see one use of _GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS:
>> $prefix/arm-eabi/include/c++/6.0.0/bits/concept_check.h
>
> I'm fine with changing it there. We should also document that the
> macro doesn't do anything for freestanding implementations.
>

Done.  Attached is a new version of my patch with a small
documentation update.  I just used your wording if you don't mind.

Is it Ok for trunk when boot-strap and regression-testing completed?


Thanks
Bernd.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch-freestanding-headers.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5869 bytes
Desc: patch-freestanding-headers.diff
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/attachments/20160322/f49dead5/attachment.bin>