This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: SH-ELF (& COFF): Setting of _stack and placement of stack sentinelvalue (Was: Re: [PATCH]crt1.asm- _stack symbol causes problem for SH-ELF-Pl. refer accepted patch at newlib by Jeff J.)
- From: tm <tm at mail dot kloo dot net>
- To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
- Cc: anitak <anitak at kpit dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, marka at cygnus dot com,newlib at sources dot redhat dot com, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>,green at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: SH-ELF (& COFF): Setting of _stack and placement of stack sentinelvalue (Was: Re: [PATCH]crt1.asm- _stack symbol causes problem for SH-ELF-Pl. refer accepted patch at newlib by Jeff J.)
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> There are four linker scripts in libgloss/sh that presumably need updating,
> since they don't define _stack, but only __stack. They do look somewhat
> funny already, though, since they talk about for support for both a.out and
> coff, and SGI/MIPS DWARF 2 extensions.
> And the constructor / destructor scheme looks like coff, which means that
> it was broken by the newlib change in December.
>
> Is anybody actually using these scripts?
If these are the scripts used when doing normal compiles (e.g. for the
simulator and etc) then I am using them.
Toshi