This is the mail archive of the newlib@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Compiling newlib natively [PATCH]


Hmm, this was bound to happen with newlib using a combination of our headers and external headers.

I get a problem because my Red Hat linux/time.h brings in linux/types.h. This causes the following:

#ifndef __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

typedef __kernel_fd_set         fd_set;
typedef __kernel_dev_t          dev_t;
...

to define a number of types. When newlib's sys/types.h gets included, there is a conflict among a number of the types.

On all of my Red Hat Linux boxes (both old and new), the /usr/include/linux/stat.h does not include linux/time.h so I don't run into that particular problem with mktime. I can only assume your linux/time.h isn't dragging in linux/types.h or doesn't have the clause above being invoked. Can you attach a copy of your linux/time.h and linux/stat.h so I can try and come up with some compromise (a.k.a kludge) that works for both. My first instinct is to try defining/undefining __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES around the include but it would be good to see what your include files are.

-- Jeff J.

Shaun Jackman wrote:
Certainly. linux/time.h defines a version of mktime that's quite
different than the version defined in
newlib/libc/sys/linux/include/time.h. linux/time.h only defines mktime
if __KERNEL__ is defined. newlib/libc/sys/linux/sys/stat.h defines
__KERNEL__, includes linux/stat.h, which in turn includes,
linux/time.h, which redefines mktime. My fix is to include
linux/time.h before sys/stat.h defines __KERNEL__. I've attached
glob.i, which illustrates my problem. How does this fix break your
build?

Cheers,
Shaun

gcc -I/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/_build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/newlib/targ-include
-I/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/newlib/libc/include
-DPACKAGE=\"newlib\" -DVERSION=\"1.12.0\" -I.
-I../../../../../../../newlib/libc/sys/linux/stdlib -O2 -Wall
-D_I386MACH_ALLOW_HW_INTERRUPTS -DHAVE_FCNTL -fPIC
-D_I386MACH_NEED_SOTYPE_FUNCTION -DMISSING_SYSCALL_NAMES -fno-builtin
-O2 -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -O2 -c
../../../../../../../newlib/libc/sys/linux/stdlib/glob.c  -fPIC -DPIC
-o .libs/glob.o
In file included from
/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/_build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/newlib/targ-include/pthread.h:21,
                from /usr/include/bits/libc-lock.h:24,
                from
/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/_build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/newlib/targ-include/sys/lock.h:14,
                from
/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/_build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/newlib/targ-include/sys/dirent.h:13,
                from
/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/newlib/libc/include/dirent.h:6,
                from
../../../../../../../newlib/libc/sys/linux/stdlib/glob.c:73:
/home/sjackman/work/debian/newlib/newlib-20041126/_build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/newlib/targ-include/time.h:67:
error: conflicting types for `mktime'
/usr/include/linux/time.h:285: error: previous declaration of `mktime'


On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:43:10 -0500, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com> wrote:


Shaun,

  Can you discuss the mktime problem that the 2nd part of your patch is fixing?
 The change unfortunately breaks my linux newlib build whereas the glob.c
change is fine.

-- Jeff J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]