This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch,rtems] Don't build __assert_func for RTEMS

From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
To: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>
Cc: "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:45:40 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch,rtems] Don't build __assert_func for RTEMS
References: <1253590588.15778.1.camel@beck.corsepiu.local>

On 21/09/09 11:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

Hi,

another RTEMS patch.

RTEMS has a version of __assert_func of its own outside of newlib and
therefore doesn't need newlib's __assert_func.

Ralf

I would like to modify this to use a generic flag rather than a check for __rtems. I really want to change all the various OS and platform checks we have in shared headers/code and replace them with more generic-usage ones (Cygwin and rtems are the most prevalent).

In this case, I would like to suggest either HAVE___ASSERT_FUNC or _EXTERNAL_ASSERT_FUNC (or feel free to come up with a better one).

I can make the change myself and add the flag to the rtems set in configure.host if you are ok with any particular flag choice.

-- Jeff J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch,rtems] Don't build __assert_func for RTEMS
  - From: Jeff Johnston

References:
- [patch,rtems] Don't build __assert_func for RTEMS
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]