This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 1:32 PM > To: 'Jeff Johnston' > Cc: newlib@sourceware.org > Subject: RE: [Patch, Newlib/Libm] Avoid index.html and Index.html file name > clash on platform like windows > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib- > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 1:41 AM > > To: newlib@sourceware.org > > Subject: Re: [Patch, Newlib/Libm] Avoid index.html and Index.html file > > name clash on platform like windows > > > > I think it is fine in libc and libm should probably do the same. The > > Index chapter in libc should not be a numbered chapter. The node > > refers to it properly. > > > > From the texinfo documentation on @unnumbered/@appendix: > > > > "Use the @unnumbered command to start a chapter-level element that > > appears without chapter numbers of any kind. Use the @appendix > command > > to start an appendix that is labeled by letter (âAâ, âBâ, â) instead > > of by number; appendices are also at the chapter level of structuring." > > > > "Write an @appendix or @unnumbered command at the beginning of a > line > > and follow it on the same line by the title, just as with @chapter. > > > > -- Jeff J. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen@redhat.com> > > To: newlib@sourceware.org > > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 7:53:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [Patch, Newlib/Libm] Avoid index.html and Index.html file > > name clash on platform like windows > > > > On Nov 6 11:05, Terry Guo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > When I copy Newlib built on Ubuntu to my Windows machine which is > > > case insensitive, I ran into this filename clash issue. I checked > > > some other GNU projects like Binutils and found they already rename > > > the node Index to something else like "AS Index". This patch intends > > > to solve same issue using same approach by rename Index to "Libm > > > Index". Tested and it works. Is it ok? > > > > I think so, but I'm not a texinfo expert. I noticed that the > > equivalent lines in libc/libc.texinfo are: > > > > * Library Index:: > > > > [...] > > > > @node Library Index > > @unnumbered Index > > > > Note the "Index" in the unnumbered directive. Is that a bug in > > libc/libc.texinfo, or should libm/libm.texinfo do the same? > > > > > > Thanks, > > Corinna > > Thank you guys for your comments. I now updated the patch and rerun the > test. No problem found. Is it OK now? > > BR, > Terry > > 2013-11-07 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com> > > * libm/libm.texinfo: Rename node Index to Library Index. > This time with correct patch. Sorry for that. BR, Terry
Attachment:
libm-index-Index-html-v3.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |