This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Nov 7 13:34, Terry Guo wrote: > > > On Nov 6 11:05, Terry Guo wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > When I copy Newlib built on Ubuntu to my Windows machine which is > > > > case insensitive, I ran into this filename clash issue. I checked > > > > some other GNU projects like Binutils and found they already rename > > > > the node Index to something else like "AS Index". This patch intends > > > > to solve same issue using same approach by rename Index to "Libm > > > > Index". Tested and it works. Is it ok? > > > > > > I think so, but I'm not a texinfo expert. I noticed that the > > > equivalent lines in libc/libc.texinfo are: > > > > > > * Library Index:: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > @node Library Index > > > @unnumbered Index > > > > > > Note the "Index" in the unnumbered directive. Is that a bug in > > > libc/libc.texinfo, or should libm/libm.texinfo do the same? > > Jeff Johnston wrote: > > > I think it is fine in libc and libm should probably do the same. The > > > Index chapter in libc should not be a numbered chapter. The node > > > refers to it properly. > > > > > > From the texinfo documentation on @unnumbered/@appendix: > > > > > > "Use the @unnumbered command to start a chapter-level element that > > > appears without chapter numbers of any kind. Use the @appendix > > command > > > to start an appendix that is labeled by letter (âAâ, âBâ, â) instead > > > of by number; appendices are also at the chapter level of structuring." > > > > > > "Write an @appendix or @unnumbered command at the beginning of a > > line > > > and follow it on the same line by the title, just as with @chapter. > > > > > > -- Jeff J. > > > > Thank you guys for your comments. I now updated the patch and rerun the > > test. No problem found. Is it OK now? > > [...] Uh, sorry guys, but you seem to have both misunderstood me. What I was up to is the fact that the @unnumbered entry in libc.texinfo is *not* "Library Index", but only "Index". My question was about this point. What's right for the @unnumbered entry, just "Index" as in libc.texinfo or ""Library Index" as Terry proposed now? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
pgp5ai2npV3yD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |