This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: runtime control.c

From: Martin Hunt <hunt at redhat dot com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
Cc: "systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com" <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:39:43 -0700
Subject: Re: runtime control.c
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
References: <20050704215715.GF16594@redhat.com> <1120585790.3656.6.camel@tiger> <20050705193216.GG16594@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:32 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

> For one thing, the translator/driver will have to compile multiple
> kernel modules, not just the probe itself.  If relayfs fails to make
> it into the base kernel rpm, the total would be three.  One is better.

Why would we not distribute relayfs.ko and stp-control.ko as part of the
systemtap rpm? There is no reason to have the translator compile them.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: runtime control.c
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

References:
- runtime control.c
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: runtime control.c
  - From: Martin Hunt
- Re: runtime control.c
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]