This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug kprobes/2152] jprobe variant to run handler instead of probed function


------- Additional Comments From anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com  2006-01-16 17:26 -------
> Probably just calling "return" instead of "jprobe_return" from the jprobe
> handler would do the trick ? 
You can't do that(at least in the current design) as jprobe_handler are 
executed with preempt disabled and current_kprobe set to this probe. Hence 
jprobe_handler() _must_ execute jprobe_return(), so that Kprobe code can 
reverse the preempt count and clear current_kprobe.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2152

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]