This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: nightly test result of systemtap in ppc64


On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 16:42 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hien Nguyen <hien@us.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > powerpc does not like [%lld vs int64_t]
> > but likes this [%lld vs (long long)]
> > or this [%ld vs int64_t]
> > could it be a compiler bug?
> 
> More likely a "pilot error" in the new code.  

If you mean I checked in a new vsnprintf() but not a new snprintf(), you
are right. I'll get that checked in.

When writing vsnprintf(), I changed %lld to expect int64_t instead of
"long long". And then I forgot to also check in a new snprintf(). That's
the reason for the errors.

Martin






Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]