This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:58, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > jkenisto wrote: > ... > > > [...] Yes, pretty slow. In my prototype, my user-mode handler just > > increments a counter. On my Pentium M, overhead per probepoint hit > > is ~14.2 usec, compared with 1.03 usec for the uprobes version last > > posted to LKML. [...] > > It would be good to see your code. I'm surprised the slowdown is > *only* a factor of 14. Code (and README, tests, bug report) attached. The slowdown is still about 14x (over LKML uprobes), even after generalizing for multiple probes and multiple processes. It slows down significantly (and often breaks -- see README) when probing multiple heavily-probe-burdened processes simultaneously. I'm out of the office 'til Monday, BTW. Jim
Attachment:
libptp.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |