S390x 4-21 Snapshot test results

[David Wilder <dwilder at us dot ibm dot com>]

Hi-
Here is the test results from s390x testing of the 4-21 snapshot.  The 
results are exactly the same as last week.

Several changes that affected the results were checked in this week.   
So, I have included the test results from a current CVS view (as of  
yesterday).   

** 4-21-2007 snapshot. **
         === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes            334
# of unexpected failures        11
# of expected failures          129
# of known failures             7
# of untested testcases         7
# of unsupported tests          2

FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp -  PR 4393
FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(semantic error) - PR 3833 
FAIL: profile (timeout) 
FAIL: profile 
FAIL: sysopen (0)  -  PR4329
FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp compilation -  PR4331
FAIL: 64-bit signal  - PR 4425
FAIL: 64-bit timer - PR 4391
FAIL: 32-bit alarm 
FAIL: 32-bit mmap
FAIL: 32-bit signal  - PR 4425
------------------------------------------

** Current CVS View- results **
=== systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes            335
# of unexpected failures        8
# of expected failures          129
# of known failures             7
# of untested testcases         7
# of unsupported tests          2

FAIL: systemtap.base/add.stp startup (eof) 
FAIL: buildok/seventeen.stp - PR 4393
FAIL: systemtap.samples/lket(semantic error) - PR 3833
FAIL: sysopen (0) - PR4329
FAIL: systemtap.stress/current.stp compilation - PR4331
FAIL: 64-bit signal  - PR 4425
FAIL: 64-bit timer - PR 4391
FAIL: 32-bit signal  - PR 4425

New Failures:
1) add.stp startup (eof)  - insmod: error inserting 
'/tmp/stapVEeORk/stap_21cc76dfd6ea0d48aa503522b351c8bc_493.ko': -1 File 
exists^

2) 32-bit signal  - PR 4425 - This test was not run last week.  The 
failure is cover under PR 4425 (same as 64-bit test) , so it is not a 
new failure :)

--
David Wilder
IBM Linux Technology Center
Beaverton, Oregon, USA 
dwilder@us.ibm.com
(503)578-3789