Re: [PATCH] relay-file-read-start-pos-fix.patch

[Tom Zanussi <zanussi at us dot ibm dot com>]

On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:31 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

[...]

> P.S.
> I attached my patch (relay-file-read-overwrite-mode-fix.patch)
> which fixed the problem pointed in previous mail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> 

Hi,

Thanks for sending the test case.  I wrote my own program that tests for
the same thing, and it also works fine.  To make sure it doesn't break
no-overwrite mode, I also ran several tests with blktrace and that looks
good too.

Thanks very much for analyzing the problem and providing the patch!

Just to summarize - the problem this fixes is that in overwrite mode,
the current read code doesn't pick up all the data it could if the whole
buffer is filled - it will leave behind sub-buffers at the beginning.
With this patch, the data in those sub-buffers is read as well.

Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>

> ---
>  kernel/relay.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/relay.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/relay.c	2007-06-13 20:22:02.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/relay.c	2007-06-20 10:53:06.000000000 +0900
> @@ -812,7 +812,10 @@
>  	}
> 
>  	buf->bytes_consumed += bytes_consumed;
> -	read_subbuf = read_pos / buf->chan->subbuf_size;
> +	if (!read_pos)
> +		read_subbuf = buf->subbufs_consumed % n_subbufs;
> +	else
> +		read_subbuf = read_pos / buf->chan->subbuf_size;
>  	if (buf->bytes_consumed + buf->padding[read_subbuf] == subbuf_size) {
>  		if ((read_subbuf == buf->subbufs_produced % n_subbufs) &&
>  		    (buf->offset == subbuf_size))
> @@ -841,8 +844,9 @@
>  	}
> 
>  	if (unlikely(produced - consumed >= n_subbufs)) {
> -		consumed = (produced / n_subbufs) * n_subbufs;
> +		consumed = produced - n_subbufs + 1;
>  		buf->subbufs_consumed = consumed;
> +		buf->bytes_consumed = 0;
>  	}
>  	
>  	produced = (produced % n_subbufs) * subbuf_size + buf->offset;
> 
> 
> 
>