This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug uprobes/4738] UPROBES_SSOL and URETPROBES must depend on UPROBES in Kconfig


------- Additional Comments From jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com  2007-07-11 17:02 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > See "Advice from Dave Hansen" (from a code review) in Comment #3.  Look at
> > arch/*/Kconfig, and you'll see lots of "config" options with no prompts [...]
> 
> What I'm missing is why these should show up as CONFIG_ANYTHING at all.
> Why not just include uretprobes always,

Some people seem to think uretprobes is harder to grok and/or port than one
might suppose.  So we provide for the possibility of a port that implements
uprobes but not uretprobes.

> and SSOL automagically as available
> on the platform?

We do.  However, as part of the magic, the platform-dependent code must indicate
whether it supports SSOL.  The interminable argument is about how to express that.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4738

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]