[Bug translator/4915] Incorrect code for accessing function argument

["wcohen at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat dot com  2007-08-13 20:11 -------
Yes, the 2.6.9-55.0.2 kernels are official kernels installed from RPMs. The
debuginfo is publically available from:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/4AS/en/os/Debuginfo/i386/RPMS

Here are the related RPMs installed on the machine:

$ rpm -qa |grep kernel|grep 2.6.9-55.0.2
kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-doc-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-55.0.2.EL

This open.stp example in the bugzilla appears to be working in this case.
However, many of the systemtap.systemcall calls still fail. Are the tests
passing when running something like the following?

 runtest --tool_opts install --tool systemtap --srcdir
/home/wcohen/stap_testing_200708131335/src/testsuite systemtap.syscall/*.exp 

There are still many failures in the systemtap.log for 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL kernel.

Looking through the many "<uknown>" arguments in place of strings. So the tests
are running correctly on the RHEL4 i686 machine there? The question is what is
different between the environments? Same kernel rpms? Same gcc and elfutils?

Could this be a result of using elfutils 0.127 vs. 0.128? The elfutils source is
being extracted from the devel elfutils rpm.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.