This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug tapsets/5555] signal-all-probes.stp and proc_snoop.stp fail on ia64
- From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 9 Jan 2008 14:42:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tapsets/5555] signal-all-probes.stp and proc_snoop.stp fail on ia64
- References: <20080108215138.5555.mhiramat@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2008-01-09 14:42 -------
> -probe signal.handle = kernel.function("handle_signal")
> +probe signal.handle = kernel.function("handle_signal") ? ,
> + kernel.function("handle_signal32") ?
Why would both handle_signal and handle_signal32 be marked optional?
Could one of them be favoured with the "!" (optional & sufficient)
designation?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5555
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.