This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug translator/6529] error() from nested function can be lost
- From: "joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 28 May 2008 18:16:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug translator/6529] error() from nested function can be lost
- References: <20080516175929.6529.jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From joshua dot i dot stone at intel dot com 2008-05-28 18:16 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (with code that computes "outlabel" as per ::visit_statement).
Frank - can you explain the need for the computed outlabels? I see the comment
about loops in visit_statement, but it doesn't look like anything special is
happening.
I'm thinking about a cleanup that removes most of the "if (last_error)" checks,
and always use unconditional jumps instead. I think the only last_error checks
needed are after function calls and at the end of probes. We should also be
able to get rid of this goofy last_error="" business.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joshua dot i dot stone at
| |intel dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6529
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.