This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug translator/16300] suppress statement-counting protections in loop-free non-recursive probe handlers


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16300

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jistone at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #0)
> This might extended to some loops too, if we pessimistically estimate
> small number-of-iterations, such as foreach-limit ones, or loops over
> fixed integer ranges, or over small arrays.

Beware nested multiplication of loops too, whether directly nested or even
indirectly via function calls.  They couldn't be made infinite this way, if we
keep recursion protection, but still could be unreasonably huge.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]