This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Meaningful parameters.
- From: "Erik Jessen" <ejessen at adelphia dot net>
- To: "Stanley Sutton" <sutton at t-surf dot com>,<xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 14:56:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: Meaningful parameters.
- References: <8CB7243165D750498B12F7F868535B4009488B@pline2>
Making code more standardized, readable and maintanable is
*always* worth it.
Are you going to put some sort of a standard someplace in the
comments (so other people can follow it)?
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stanley Sutton" <sutton@t-surf.com>
To: <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: Meaningful parameters.
> Since I'm in actions.c, documenting, I'm trying to modify the parameter
> names to someting a little easier to follow while I'm changing things.
>
> I'm pretty uniformly changing *unit to *actor, m to material, n to
> amount. After that, things are a bit less uniform. It's wordier (more
> wordy?), but I think it reads a little better. Of course, it means
> backtracking and changing things I've already documented, and changing a
> fair amount of code, but it's probably worth the effort.
>
>