This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jim Kingdon wrote:
The kind of thing which you describe has always been typical of what happens with -O and -g.
Why bother with -O? Can't speak for other platforms, but compiling under Windows using VS 2003, I don't observe any slowdown running a debug only version of the Tk client. This is on a 866 MHz Pentium III. I think this indicates that Tk is a super-pig super-bottleneck.
Pig perhaps, but bottleneck no. Xconq's critical paths don't involve tcl's own code; that was a key criterion for adopting tcl. Check out the map drawing code in any of the GUIs to see where the real optimization struggle is going on.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |