This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: First stable version of improved ai_plan_research
- From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
- To: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: Lincoln Peters <sampln at sbcglobal dot net>, Xconq list <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:38:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: First stable version of improved ai_plan_research
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Elijah Meeks wrote:
> You could add GDL support for this by letting the
> Designers write weighted tables.
Currently, Xconq only supports tables of integers. One would need
to implement suport for tables of lists first.
> It would still be useful to have an
> advance-precludes-advance table, in those cases when
> two advances are actually in opposition to each other.
I think the example regarding Opal makes a good case for this.
As was previously mentioned, you can, in theory, shut off
advances by degrading the production of a material needed to
research them. The only problem there might be if someone hoarded
the material needed for the precluded advance ahead of time....
I'll add 'advance-precludes-advance' to my todo list.
Eric