This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bug in side_controls_unit

From: Lincoln Peters <sampln at sbcglobal dot net>
To: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
Cc: Xconq list <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:36:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Bug in side_controls_unit
References: <1095204082.15989.7.camel@localhost> <4147B18D.1080106@phy.cmich.edu>

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 20:05, Eric McDonald wrote:
> > (table unit-control-range
> >   (u* u* 0)
> >   (knight commoner 4)			;; Knights can (try to) aid lost villagers.
> 
> Shouldn't knights have a 'control-chance' greater than 0 vs. commoners, 
> in order for the range to mean anything?

I think you're right; I'll fix that before I do any more testing.

---
Lincoln Peters
<sampln@sbcglobal.net>

Dental health is next to mental health.

References:
- Bug in side_controls_unit
  - From: Lincoln Peters
- Re: Bug in side_controls_unit
  - From: Eric McDonald

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]