This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: Variables and constants


>> The one argument I haven't seen in anything I've read is any discussion
of ease >> of use, ease of learning, or (sacrilege) "why not ask the users
what they want?"

Hmmm ... it would also seem to me that the presence of <xsl:call-template>
is a compromise that allows procedural programmers to adjust to XSLT faster.
I can't see any other really compelling reasons for its existence. Please
correct me if I'm wrong here.

Come to think about it, doesn't <xsl:for-each> also fit the same bill? I
can't see why <xsl:apply-templates> + modes can't accomplish the same things
that <xsl:for-each> can.

Cheers,
-John


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]