This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance
- To: "XSL List" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance
- From: "Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig at iitp dot ru>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 01:03:49 +0300
- References: <5F68209F7E4BD111A5F500805FFE35B91D3FDE59@RED-MSG-54>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Andy and I, along
> with other members of the MSXML team have had a lot of conversations
> about being more open to the XML community and putting a human face
> on our development activities. Andrew's post is a great example of
> our moves in this direction.
I agree. You have noticed the positive effect of Andy's message; let's hope
this will become a common practice. Prior to your message, I was absolutely
sure that Microsoft people decided to ignore XSL-list. Even announcements
about new versions of MSXML (both January and March) were posted here
by persons external to Microsoft; why not by Andy or you?
> Also, this issue has shown that a void of accurate information can quickly
> become a forum for "MS bashing" and that the best way we can avoid this is
> to provide accurate and timely information to the community.
I presume many people here have some experience in writing universally
acceptable JavaScript ;-). By having a non-conformant XSL(T) in the Internet
Explorer, we risk to recreate the same situation in the stylesheet domain.
IE XSL influences the practice of routine XSL writing - just because it is
installed in a number of copies zillion times greater than XT or Saxon.
No wonder the reaction to yet another delay in proper XSLT support has
been so nervous: a ghost of XSL'98/JScript'2000 is still wandering around.
Best regards,
Nikolai Grigoriev
RenderX
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list