This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)


Do you have any performance numbers comparing the difference between running
the Java XSLT processor with and without compiled stylesheets? Thanks.

Khalid

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Sergeant" <matt@sergeant.org>
To: <xsl-list@mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:06 PM
Subject: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)


> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > I used to use mod_perl. It has great performance (<20ms) but it consumes
a
> > huge amount of memory. Because of the memory consumption I switched to
Java
> > which uses almost no memory when compared to Perl but it turns out that
Java
> > is a lot slower.
>
> There are work arounds for this. See http://perl.apache.org/guide/
>
> --
> <Matt/>
>
> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
> Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
> Email for training and consultancy availability.
> http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]