This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Best way to handle multiple string replacements?
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Best way to handle multiple string replacements?
- From: Warren Hedley <w dot hedley at auckland dot ac dot nz>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 10:07:47 -0400
- Organization: Department of Engineering Science, The University of Auckland
- References: <393BE859.CE102032@auckland.ac.nz> <200006052133.WAA16312@nag.co.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
David Carlisle wrote:
>
> But latex can handle that range by default, just enable latin1 encoding
> (which is the same as unicode in this range) There is no need to replace
> those characters by command sequences.
I'm using Thomas Esser's TeTex distribution. The latex app doesn't
give me any errors when processing the ``high'' characters, but
they don't show up in the DVI or Postscript output. I'm not sure
if this is a problem with latex or my font setup. As the macros do
work, I assume it is with latex.
Is the ability to handle these characters properly something that
must be set at compile time? An environment variable? Command line
options? Some package?
> Incidentally, does anyone know what the LaTeX macro for ¶
> (pilcrow sign = paragraph sign) is?
> \P
and \textparagraph apparently.
Thanks.
--
Warren Hedley
Department of Engineering Science
Auckland University
New Zealand
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list