This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: MSXML document() function.
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: MSXML document() function.
- From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo dot gaspar at krankikom dot de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 01:00:46 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
I sure hope you are right.
It will be like a dream becoming truth!
=:o)
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Joshua Allen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 10:48
> To: 'xsl-list@mulberrytech.com'
> Cc: Charlie Heinemann; 'Chris@Bayes.co.uk'
> Subject: RE: MSXML document() function.
>
>
> I am going to take a guess that the server-side HTTP
> has been fixed in the latest prerelease to scale beyond
> 5 or so concurrent requests. Charlie, do you know if
> the July release of the MSXML3 has now escaped from
> using WinInet?
>
> Thanks!
> -Joshua
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Bayes [mailto:Chris@Bayes.co.uk]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 10:04 AM
> > To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> > Subject: RE: MSXML document() function.
> >
> >
> > >Where are you trying to use document()? If it is in a ASP or
> > >in a Server application it will probably NOT work since the
> > >library that is currently used by MSXML for HTTP transfers is
> > >a Internet Explorer COM component that does not work well in
> > >multithreaded applications.
> >
> > MS has been promising a fix for this for nearly 2 years. Does
> > anyone know
> > when it will be fixed?
> > Will it make it into the Gold release?
> >
> > Ciao Chris
> >
> > XML/XSL Portal
> > http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list